Relationship Between H-type Hypertension and Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim To study the relationship between H-type hypertension and cognitive impairment in elderly patients.Methods 150 elderly essential hypertension patients were selected from the Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between August 2011 and February 2013.According to the plasmatic homocysteine( Hcy) levels the elderly essential hypertension patients were divided into 3 groups( none Htype hypertension group:Hcy 10 μmol/ L 40 patients; H-type hypertension group 1:10 μmol/ L≤Hcy 20 μmol/ L 60patients; H-type hypertension group 2:Hcy≥20 μmol/ L 50 patients).The mini-mental state examination( MMSE),Montreal cognitive assessment( MoCA) and the activities of daily living( ADL) were used to evaluate the cognitive function.According to the MMSE score and ADL score,the H-type hypertension patients were divided into 3 groups( control group,22 patients; mild cognitive impairment( MCI) group,54 patients; cognitive impairment( CI) group,34 patients).Results In comparison to none H-type hypertension group,fasting blood glucose( FBG),postprandial blood glucose( PBG),Hcy and uric acid( UA) levels increased significantly,and MMSE score and ADL score decreased significantly in H-type hypertension group 1 and H-type hypertension group 2.In comparison to H-type hypertension group 1,creatinine( Cr),PBG and Hcy levels increased significantly,and MMSE score and ADL score decreased significantly in H-type hypertension group 2.There is a negative correlation between the score of MoCA and plasmatic Hcy level in elderly H-type hypertension patients.Conclusion Elderly patients with H-type hypertension have higher risk for cognitive impairment,and higher plasma Hcy level,the more severe the cognition impaired.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".