MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2369403945

Effect of K_2CO_3 and Fe_2O_3 on combustion reactivity of pulverized coal by thermogravimetry analysis

2009· article· en· W2369403945 on OpenAlexaff
Zhi Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueRanliao huaxue xuebao · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthraciteChemistryCombustionAutoignition temperatureCoalBituminous coalIgnition systemThermogravimetryCatalysisReactivity (psychology)GraphitePulverized coal-fired boilerEnergy value of coalChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Waste managementInorganic chemistryCoal combustion productsThermodynamics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of K2CO3,Fe2O3 on catalytic combustion reactivity of different rank fuels such as lignite,bituminous coal,anthracite and graphite were investigated by a synthetical thermal analyzer.The results show that the type and content of catalysts,particle size and rank of fuel are important factors influencing catalytic combustion.When K2CO3 and Fe2O3 were added,ignition temperature of anthracite decreases from 458℃ to 319℃ and 405℃,respectively.And its combustion rate increases from 11.94%/min to 26.40%/min and 17.66%/min,respectively.There are not evident effects of K2CO3,Fe2O3 on decreasing ignition temperature of lignite and bituminous coal,but ignition temperature of anthracite and graphite decreases remarkably.With increasing rank of fuel,extent of decreasing ignition temperature is enhanced.Due to different factors led to changes of ignition temperature and combustion rate which changes are different too when catalyst is present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRanliao huaxue xuebaoSame topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207