Bibliographic record
Abstract
"The artists who share their personal quilted Reflection.J of Canada in this inaugural Grano NationaL exhibition in 2003, have truly 'thrown down the gauntlet' to painters of traditional schools of landscape art. Clearly moved and inspired by their natural surroundings, they have artfully employed a full spectrum of creative tools and techniques to capture not only the essence of Canada's diverse topography but also the many moods, memories and moments of magic these landscapes evoke and preserve. Through these quilts we travel to private and intimate places, or find ourselves centred in familiar surroundings -in calendar-perfect, Canadian settings. We discover the picturesque outports of Newfoundland, their flakes and shanties standing expectant in the early spring sunlight; we linger on the shores of Fundy as the cold, grey fog rolls in, softening reality to abstraction; we stand knee-deep in a prairie wheat field marvelling at the infinite abundance of time and space, the "continuous flow of now"; we experience the awe-inspiring drama of a Nunavut Aurora, the welcoming brightness of a Chinook Arch in the foothills of Alberta, the promise of a "Group of Seven" sunset in Ontario cottage country. Reflection/ artists have truly elevated the genre of the landscape quilt, demonstrating once-and-for-aU, the astonishing versatility of the fabric medium and its unique ability to imitate and interpret the beauty and wonder of nature." -- Susan Burke, Allan MacKay, page 8.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".