MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W236975375

The Grand National, Reflections of Canada

2003· article· en· W236975375 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alf Bogusky, Susan Burke, Allan MacKay

Bibliographic record

VenueE-Artexte (Artexte) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"The artists who share their personal quilted Reflection.J of Canada in this inaugural Grano NationaL exhibition in 2003, have truly 'thrown down the gauntlet' to painters of traditional schools of landscape art. Clearly moved and inspired by their natural surroundings, they have artfully employed a full spectrum of creative tools and techniques to capture not only the essence of Canada's diverse topography but also the many moods, memories and moments of magic these landscapes evoke and preserve. Through these quilts we travel to private and intimate places, or find ourselves centred in familiar surroundings -in calendar-perfect, Canadian settings. We discover the picturesque outports of Newfoundland, their flakes and shanties standing expectant in the early spring sunlight; we linger on the shores of Fundy as the cold, grey fog rolls in, softening reality to abstraction; we stand knee-deep in a prairie wheat field marvelling at the infinite abundance of time and space, the "continuous flow of now"; we experience the awe-inspiring drama of a Nunavut Aurora, the welcoming brightness of a Chinook Arch in the foothills of Alberta, the promise of a "Group of Seven" sunset in Ontario cottage country. Reflection/ artists have truly elevated the genre of the landscape quilt, demonstrating once-and-for-aU, the astonishing versatility of the fabric medium and its unique ability to imitate and interpret the beauty and wonder of nature." -- Susan Burke, Allan MacKay, page 8.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE-Artexte (Artexte)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207