Breakup of China-Korea Platform and Establishment of North China and Huatai Cratons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Half a century ago, the well-known pre-Cambrian crystalline basement outcrops extensively in the southern Northeast China, North China and Alashan Desert of Northwest China, which were considered by T.K. Huang and J.S. Ren as a unitary China-Korea Platform. This idea has been being in use until now. Recently, the studies of tectonostratigraphic terrain demonstrate that the China-Korea Platform is composed of both the North China Craton and the Huatai Craton, and contains 11 terrains in all. The range of North China Craton redefined was limited within northern and western Liaoning province, Hebei province, main part of Shanxi province, and northern Shaanxi province. The other regions of original China-Korea Platform, including southern Jilin province, Liaodong peninsula, Shandong province, northern parts of Anhui and Jiangsu provinces, Henan province, the Shaanxi plain and the Alashan Desert-Helan Mts. constitute the new established Huatai craton. The boundary between two cratons and adjacent Paleozoic organic belts are separated by a series of large faults. The North China Craton is the initial continent crust in whole China, which is composed of 4 terrains, including the Yanliao continent block, Jinji orogenic belt, Mengshan continent block and the Yinshan rift belt. The North China Craton originated from the late Paleoproterozoic (1850Ma) orogeny and collision, which resulted in assembly of the former 3 terrains and finally solidification of the craton. The Yinshan rift belt occurred in Mesoproterozoic and was the remains of separation of North China Craton and Siberia Platform. The prominent features of North China Craton are the unconformity between Paleoproterozoic Hutuo Group and Mesoproterozoic Changcheng System, and the deposition of Mesoproterozoic caprock represented by the Jixian profile. According to these characteristics, only Siberia Platform and Canada Shield in the world are comparable to this craton. Over the crystalline basement of Huatai Craton, the first unconformity between Palaeo-Meso Proterozoic Liaohe Group and Neoproterozoic Xihe Group marked its solidification in about 1000 Ma. Therefore, the origin of Huatai Craton can be traced in the world. It is quite evident that Rodinia was a united ancient continent in Neoproterozoic. In view of Cambrian stratigraphic studies in China, it is believed that the assembly between North China Craton and Huatai Craton occurred at the beginning of the Middle Cambrian (about 536 Ma). Before Middle Cambrian, two cratons belonged to different ancient continents and had never been jointed. Therefore there was no united China-Korea Platform during the period from Archean to early stage of Cambrian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".