A study on growth characteristics of different cultivars of oat(Avena sativa) in alpine region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phonological phase,plant height,number of plants,yield and ratio of stem and leaf of eleven oat(Avena sativa) varieties in alpine regions of the Eastern Qilian Mountains were studied.The varieties Denmark No.444 and No.1 Qing-yongjiu could mature in these regions making them suitable for harvesting seeds and herbages.The plant height,plant tillers and herbage yield of introduced varieties were 130.6-155.7 cm,2.77 tillers and 13.32-21.77 t/ha respectively,which were 1.1-1.4 times,1.2 times and 1.9-3.2 times compared with the control.The varieties No.479 Qing-yongjiu,No.52 Qing-yongjiu,No.489 Qing-yongjiu,Chabei and Canadian had higher leaf contents(about 15% of total yields),while No.52 Qing-yongjiu,No.440 Qing-yongjiu,No.47 Qing-yongjiu,No.101 Qing-yongjiu,No.489 Qing-yongjiu,Chabei and Denmark No.444 had higher herbage yields(18.10 to 21.77 t/ha).The yields of oats could be estimated by the model Y=2 849.445+32.523H(R=0.886,P0.01),where Y is the hay yields(g/m2) and H is the plant height(cm).Thus,the varieties No.52 Qing-yongjiu,No.479 Qing-yongjiu and Chabei had higher yields and leaf contents,making them suitable for planting in the alpine region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".