Effects of anti-helicobacter pylori Therapy on the ammonia in patients with liver cirrhyosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the significance of anti helicobacter pylori(Hp) therapy to the patients of cirrhosis company with Hp infection,sixty three cases of patients were divided into two growps randomly,control group(CG)and treated group(TG).The patients in TG were treated with oral omeprazole,Clanithromycin and Motronidazole by oral administration,while Oral omeprazole was only given to the patients in CG.Before and after treatment of two and four weeks,the data in both groups were analysed.Results:compared with CG,the concentration of ammonia in the patients of TG was decreased significantly(P0.01);but it was increased significantly in CG after treatment(P0.01).The Anti Hp therapy is very important to decrease the serum ammonia and prevent the development of hepatlc encephalopathy.Strong antiacid could keep the pH in the stomach more than 6 for a long time,that the ammonia produced by urea enzyme will diffuse much into the blood and the serum ammonia will be increasing.It is suggested that the anti Hp therapy clinically is very important for the patients of cirrhosis company with Hp infection and we should pay much attention to that the ammonia will be increasing if the strong antacid are only used to the patients for a long time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".