MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2371376802

Screening of Actinomycetes and Effect of Its Fermentation on Seed Germination of Wheat

2012· article· en· W2371376802 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
LI Dui-shu

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriticaleGerminationFermentationActinomycesRadicleAgronomyBiologyHorticultureFood scienceChemistryBacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eight strains of actinomyces were selected to inhibit mixed bacteriums with 50 g/mL K2Cr2O7 added into GA from soil in Luonan county of Shaanxi province.Actinomyces A 4 had stronger biocontrol effect to the disease germs,so as to get the growth promoting to shangmai 5226 and triticale.The results showed that the different concentrations fermentation of actinomyces A 4 had growth promoting effect on Seed Germination and radicle growth of wheat,and had obvious influence on its growth traits.With increasing of dilution multiple of fermentation,the wheat got the growth promoting effect increased gradually.When fermentation was diluted with 50 times,fermentation of actinomyces A 4 got the optimal induction to wheat.When two kinds of wheat were cultured in 18 h,actinomyces A 4 fermentation fluid was diluted with 50 times,germination of shangmai 5226(95.33%)was higher than that of triticale(90%),and germination index of shangmai 5226(6.926) was higher than that of triticale(5.361).Two kinds of wheat were cultured at 6 h,radical length of shangmai 5226 was longer than ck,and it was longer than that of triticale.Radical length of triticale was longer than ck.Therefore actinomyces A 4 can improve significantly growth and development of shangmai 5226 and triticale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207