Study on Dormancy and Germination Characters of Wild Lily (Lilium sargentiae Wilson) Seed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wild Luding lily is Liliaceae Lilium perennial herbs,with very high medicinal and ornamental value.Under natural conditions Luding lily seed germination rate is very low,mainly depend on the bud bulbs reproducing.For study the wild Luding lily seed dormancy and germination characters,different constant temperature 20 ℃,30 ℃ and variable temperature 20 ℃ to 30 ℃ were studied under light(day light 12 hr per day) and dark conditions.stratified for 7,14,21,28 d and 60d at 5 ℃,respectively.And treated with 100 mg/L GA3 as well as.The results showed that: constant 20 ℃ and variable 20 ℃ to 30 ℃ under dark conditions were optimum condition for wild Luding lily seed germination,with the shortest germination time and the highest germination rates 45%;also 100 mg/L of GA3 treatment on seed germination significantly improved.but 5 ℃ stratification treatment had no significant facilitating role for the wild Luding lily seed germination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".