MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2372010367

BCL-6,CD10 and BCL-2 protein expression in B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and its clinicopathologic significance

2006· article· en· W2372010367 on OpenAlexaff
Daren Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo aizheng zazhi · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphomaGerminal centerMantle cell lymphomaLymphoid hyperplasiaPathologyMantle zoneFollicular lymphomaDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaMALT lymphomaFollicular hyperplasiaMarginal zoneB cellLymphoplasmacytic LymphomaLymph nodeImmunohistochemistryMedicineCancer researchAntibodyImmunologyWaldenstrom macroglobulinemia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose:Both Bcl-6 and CD10 are markers of germinal center(GC) B cells in the lymph node.Their experssion in nodal diffuse large B cell lympoma(DLBCL),extranodal DLBCL and other types of lymphoma and the sigifcance is worthy to be investigated.This paper will investigate the protein expression of BCL-6,CD10,BCL-2 gene in B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas(B-NHL) in Chinese populations and its clinic-pathological significance.Methods:Immunohistochemical analyses of BCL-6,CD10 and BCL-2 protein expression were performed on 135 cases of B-NHL including the common types occurring in Chinese populations and 5 cases of T-NHL,5 cases of nodular lymphocyte predominance Hodgkin's lymphoma(NLPHL) and 10 cases of Reactive lymphoid hyperplasia(RLH) with paraffin-embedded tissues.Results:① BCL-6 and CD10 protein were expressed almost exclusively in RLH,nodal DLBCL,extranodal DLBCL,follicular lymphoma(FL) and Burkitt's lymphoma(BL),the rates of positivity were 100% and 100%,72.7% and 40.9%, 75.9% and 41.4%,(88.9%) and 72.2% as well as 100% and 100%,respectively.BCL-6 and CD10 protein were not expressed in other B-NHL such as small lymphocytic lymphoma(B-SLL),mantle cell lymphoma(MCL),extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue(MALT-L),Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma(LPL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma(LBL) as well as T-NHL and NLPHL.BCL2 protein were expressed in nodal DLBCL,extranodal DLBCL,FL,B-SLL,MCL,MALT-L and LBL,the rates of positivity were 36.4%,27.6%,83.3%,(88.9%,)86.7%,72.7% and 33.3%,respectively.BCL-2 protein were not expressed in LPL,BL,T-NHL and NLPHL.② BCL-6 protein expression in DLBCL could be classified into four patterns: GC/FL pattern,intermediate pattern,sporadic pattern and rare or absent pattern.③ The coexpression of BCL-6 and CD10 was observed in 40.9% nodal DLBCL,41.4% extranodal DLBCL,72.2% FL and 100% BL.Among them the BCL-6 protein expressions were GC/FL pattern.(4)Low clinic stage(stageⅠandⅡ) was more frequent in nodal DLBCL cases with coexpression of BCL-6 and CD10 than those without(P0.05).Conclusions:Detection of BCL-6,CD10 and BCL-2 protein expression in combination may contribute to pathological diagnosis and differential diagnosis of some B-NHL.Nodal DLBCL with both BCL-6 and CD10 experssion pattern patients may have much better prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo aizheng zazhiSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207