MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2372117357

The Present Status of Research on Presbycusis and Intervention in China

2007· article· en· W2372117357 on OpenAlexaff
Ling Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresbycusisMedicineIntervention (counseling)AudiologyHearing lossGerontologyPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heating loss associated with aging,also known as presbycusis,seriously affects the comnmnicative abili- ties and compromises the lite styles of the elderly people in China.Presbycusis and its consequences have caught the attention of the country today.Efforts have been made to help the elderly;however,lack of well ducumented demographic data on the prevalence of presbycusis has significantly hampered the efforts to establish infrastructures for effective aural rehabilitation and clinical managemeut of the elderly people suffering from auditory deficits and other communicative difficulties. This paper intends to review the existed research articles,published in Chinese,on presbycusis and intervention,and to present our view of the present status of research in this direction.It should be noted that,there is considerable variahility in the outcomes of the studies because of inadequate study designs and poor controls of all measurement parameters.Only a few studies were carried OUt tO determine the prevalence of central auditory processing disorder(CAPD)and other cognitive dys- functions associated with elderly population in the country.The use of hearing aids is low among hearing impaired seniors.In the end,the authors will discuss the reasons that the present research on presbycusis is lagging behind and possible solutions that will he explained and shared.(Chin J Ophthalmol and Otorhinolaryngol,2007,1:9-13)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology→Same topicVestibular and auditory disorders→French-language works237,207→