MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2372259081

In vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection using frozen boar spermatozoa

2010· article· en· W2372259081 on OpenAlexaff
Rui Rong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntracytoplasmic sperm injectionBlastocystAndrologyHuman fertilizationEmbryoEmbryogenesisBOARIn vitro fertilisationBiologySpermChemistryAnatomyMedicineGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frozen boar spermatozoa were used to conduct in vitro fertilization(IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI) in swine.The effect of addition of L-cysteine into medium and different culture method for maturation was also investigated.The results showed that ICSI resulted in significantly lower cleavage rate and blastocyst percentage(68.3%versus 76.9%and 11.4% versus 19.2%,respectively(P0.05) than those from IVF group.Addition of 1.71 mmol·L~(-1) L-cysteine into medium to culture ICSI embryos for 3 h improved neither cleavage rate as well as developmental rate to morula nor blstocyst percentage significantly (P0.05).Using 0.4%BSA NCSU-23 medium for the maturation of porcine oocytes seemed to yield higher cleavage rate of ICSI embryos than other groups.However,the developmental rate of embryos from each group had no differences(P0.05),indicating that the maturation method might not impact the development of ICSI embryos.After co-culture with granulosa cells or cumulus cells,the cleavage rate of ICSI embryos was improved significantly than that of the control(P0.05),but there is no statistic difference in the blastocyst percentage among groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207