Analysis of Heterosis Among Heilongjiang Early Maize Inbred Lines and Canadian Maize Populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this experiment, analysis of combining ability and heterosis among 8 Heilongjiang elite inbred lines and 20 Canadian populations were made by NCⅡ design. The results showed that the general combining ability of yield in EP8, EP17, EP7, EP13 and EP15 were higher than that of other populations. To yield special combining ability as an index, found that K10 and EP6, EP11, EP12, EP14; L105 and EP18, EP19, EP20, EP22, EP23; Dian11A and EP7, EP8, EP9; Dong237 with EP1, EP16, EP17; He344 and EP3, EP13; Longkang11 and EP15; Xiongzhang and EP10, EP21 also had close genetic relationship respectively. From the analysis of using yield average heterosis, we could know that part pattern heterotic models are EP7×K10, EP8×K10, EP1× Longkang11, EP12×Longkang11, EP17×Xiongzhang, EP14×Dian11A; EP23×Dian11A, EP3×Dong237, EP21×Dong237.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".