Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bio-activities of 21 kinds of compounds of spiro enol ether derivatives against the2nd instar larvae of Plutella xylostella were tested for antifeedant activity.Antifeedant activity ofcompound No.8,No.12 and No.20 against 4th larvae of P.xylostella,effects of compoundNo.20 on cuticle and blood cell of 4th instar larvae of Pieris rapae,and control effect of com-pound No.20 against larvae of P.rapae were studied.Antifeedant activity of compound No.8,No.12,No.16 and No.20 against larvae of P.xylosteUa were better than those of others.AFC_(50) of compound No.8,No.12 and No.20 in non-selective test against 4th instar larvae ofP.xylostella were 549.03μg/mL,405.97μg/mL and 205.06μg/mL after 24h treatment,andAFC_(50) in selective test were 432.57μg/mL,114.34μg/mL and 72.32μg/mL.AFC_(50) of com-pound No.12,No.20 in selective test against 4th instar larvae of P.rapae were 398.88μg/mLand 280.54μg/mL,respectively,and AFC_(50) of compound No.20 in non-selective test was112.76μg/mL after 24h treatment.Compound No.20 could reduce the content of cuticle andamount of blood cell of 4th instar larvae of P.rapae.Field trial showed that control efficacy ofcompound No.20 at concentration of 800μg/mL against larvae of P.rapae were 28.60%,54.93% and 58.21% 3d,5d and 7d after treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".