[Short-term outcome of reconstruction for defect after removal of tumor with global modular replacement system].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the postoperative function and short-term outcome of Global Modular Replacement System (GMRS) for reconstruction of defect after removal of tumor so as to supply information for clinical application. METHODS: Between March 2007 and May 2009, 30 limb-salvage cases reconstructed with GMRS were retrospectively reviewed, including 18 males and 12 females with a median age of 25 years (range, 11-57 years). The preoperative diagnoses were osteosarcoma in 15 cases, malignant fibro-histiocytoma in 4, giant cell tumor in 3, chondrosarcoma in 2, and Ewing's sarcoma and angiosarcoma in 1 respectively. The duration of symptom ranged from 1 to 15 months with an average of 5.6 months. There were 4 revision cases at mean time of 3.4 years after index surgeries. The locations were the proximal femur in 3 cases, distal femur in 22 cases, and proximal tibia in 5 cases. According to Enneking stage, 2 cases were rated as stage IB, 1 as stage IIA, and 27 as stage IIB. Four cases were complicated by pathologic fracture. RESULTS: The average operation time was 165 minutes (range, 120-240 minutes); the mean blood loss was 448.3 mL (range, 100-1500 mL); and the mean resection length was 14.1 cm (range, 7.5-22.5 cm). All the wounds healed by first intention. All 30 patients were followed up 10-35 months (22.3 months on average). Local recurrence occurred in 2 cases (6.7%) at 5 and 14 months respectively and distal metastasis occurred in 5 cases (16.7%) at 4-12 months (7.3 months on average) postoperatively. One patient died of multiple lung metastases at 10 months postoperatively. Twenty-nine patients survived at last follow-up, including 25 cases of tumor-free survival and 4 cases of tumor bearing survival. Aseptic loosening occurred in 2 cases (6.7%) at 1.5 years and 2 years postoperatively respectively. Deep infection occurred in 1 case (3.3%) at 1 year postoperatively. At last follow-up, the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) 93 scores were 4.6% +/- 0.7% for pain, 3.7% +/- 0.9% for function, 3.2% +/- 1.3% for satisfactory degree, 4.3% +/- 0.9% for orthosis, 3.7% +/- 0.7% for walking, 3.3% +/- 1.0% for gait; total score was 75.9% +/- 14.2%. The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) score was 87.0 +/- 7.0. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction for defect after removal of tumor with GMRS has satisfactory short-term outcome with good function recovery and low complication rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".