MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374092983

The Value of Event Related Potential P300 and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Assessing Early Cognitive Function of Patients with Stroke in Different Brain Areas

2013· article· en· W2374092983 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo quanke yixue · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive Functions and Memory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentFrontal lobeTemporal lobeMedicineParietal lobeBasal gangliaOccipital lobeAudiologyCognitionLobeEvent-related potentialStroke (engine)Internal medicineCardiologyNeurosciencePsychologyPsychiatryCognitive impairmentPathologyCentral nervous systemEpilepsyRadiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To evaluate the value of event related potential P300(P300) and Montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA) in assessing early cognitive function of patients with stroke in different brain areas.Methods A total of 101 patients with stroke who visited the Inpatients and / or Outpatients of Neurology of our hospital between July 2011 and August 2012 were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and assigned as the study group,and another 100 patients without stroke were assigned as the control group.The patients in the study group were further divided according to the anatomic site of the infarction / bleeding lesion into five subgroups which were frontal lobe group,temporal lobe group,parietal lobe group,occipital lobe group,and basal ganglia group.The MoCA,P300,and mini mental state examination(MMSE) were used to determine the cognitive function of all subjects.Results The patients in the study group had lower MoCA score and P300 amplitude,but longer P300 latency than the control group(P 0.05).Compared with the control group,the frontal lobe and temporal lobe subgroups had lower MoCA score and P300 amplitude,but longer P300 latency;The parietal lobe subgroup had lower MoCA score;The basal ganglia subgroup had lower MoCA and longer P300 latency(P 0.05).The frontal lobe,temporal lobe,and basal ganglia subgroups had longer P300 latency than the parietal lobe and the occipital lobe subgroups,while the frontal lobe and temporal lobe subgroups had lower MoCA score and longer P300 latency than the basal ganglia subgroup(P 0.05).The patients in the study group had lower scores in executive function / visual space,naming,delayed recall,and orientation than the control group(P 0.05).The best cutoff value of MoCA was 22 score,with a sensitivity of 91.5% and a specificity of 85.7%,and that of P300 latency was 397 ms,with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 55.3% in the identification of cognitive dysfunction in the stroke patients.The Kappa value was 0.712 and 0.654 compared with MMSE(P 0.01).Conclusion Stroke in the frontal and temporal lobe may cause more serious cognitive dysfunction than stroke in other areas.MoCA and P300 latency can evaluate early cognitive function in stroke patients with high sensitivity and specificity at cutoff value of 22 score and 397 ms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it