MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2374497367

New Records of Pinnularia(Bacillariophyta) from Xinjiang,China

2007· article· en· W2374497367 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
You Qing

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF WUHAN BOTANICAL RESEARCH · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHerbariumGeographyChinaDiatomEcologyForestryBiologyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region covers an area of one sixth of Chinese territory,largest in area among all the province-level administrative regions of China.Xinjiang is situated in the hinterland of Eurasian continent and is under the control of a typical extratropical belt continental climate.Special geographic position and peculiar climate characteristic make algae resources very abundance in this region,but the research of algae flora is relatively weak.Diatom materials were collected from Xinjiang during the period of July to August,2001.Materials were obtained from a wide variety of habitats in the investigated area.In the field,samples were preserved with 4% formalin and kept in the Herbarium of the Biology Department of Shanghai Normal University.Microscope slides were prepared by acid digestion method and mounted in Canada balsam or Hyrax gum.Light microscope observations were conducted using a Nikon E800 DIC microscope at magnification×1000 and a Nikon digital cameral DXM1200.In the observation,five species and two varieties of Pinnularia(Bacillariophyta) are new records of China,They are Pinnularia halophila Krammer,P.obscuriformis Krammer,P.oriunda Krammer,P.reichardtii Krammer,P.substreptoraphe Krammer,P.substreptoraphe var.bornholmiana Krammer and P.viridiformis var.minor Krammer.The taxonomic characters and habitats of them were described.The study will provide basic data for algae resource investigation of China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJOURNAL OF WUHAN BOTANICAL RESEARCHSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207