The inhibitive effects of high intensity ultrasound on the second inoculation of the same tumor cells strain in mice with U14 cervical cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the inhibitive effects of high intensity ultrasound (HIU) on the second inoculation of the same strain tumor cells in mice with U14 cervical cancer. Methods Seventy-two mice with U14 cervical cancer were divided into three groups: a group (group A, n=24), an operation group (group B, n=24) and a sham-HIU group (group C, n=24), and treated with (50 Watt/cm~2), operation and (0 Watt/cm~2) 7 d after inoculation, respectively. The mice in each group were divided into three sub-groups(n=8) and re-inoculated with 2×10~6, 2×10~7 or 0 U14 cancer cells at 17 d after first inoculation, and then the rate of survival mice without tumor (RSWT) in every group was recorded at 150 d after second inoculation. Results RSWTs in group A, group B and group C were 100.0%,75.0% and 0.0% after re-inoculation of 2×10~6 U14 cancer cell, 87.5% ,25.0% and 0.0% after re-inoculation of 2×10~7 cells, and 100%,100%and 0% without re-inoculation, respectively. Conclusion It was effective for to treat cervical cancer in mice, furthermore the effects of HIU, playing a role as HIU solidified tumor vaccine, on the second inoculation in mice with U14 cervical cancer might be more valuable than those of operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".