Amphibians and Reptiles Resources in Liupanshan National Nature Reserve,Ningxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the establishment of Ningxia Liupanshan nature reserve,there were few reports concern on the survey of amphibians and reptiles. In order to master the status of background resources of amphibians and reptiles and evaluate the biological diversity of this nature reserve,the resources of amphibians and reptiles in the nature reserve were investigated for seven times from July,2011 to July,2013. Combined with the documented literatures,there are 14 species of amphibians and reptiles,belonging to 2 orders,7 families and 9 genera,accounts for 50. 0%( 28) of amphibians and reptiles of Ningxia; among of which,there are 5 amphibians,belonging to 1 orders,3 families and 4 genera,accounts for 71. 4%( 7) of amphibians of Ningxia,and 9 reptiles,belonging to 4 families and 5 genera,accounts for 43. 8%( 21) of reptiles of Ningxia. Amphibians and reptiles species of the nature reserve are mainly Palearctic realm species( 8) and cosmopolitan species( 5),as well as 1 oriental realm species. After compare the fauna similarity( AFR) to the neighboring nature reserve,we found there is regular replacing phenomenon in different nature reserves with latitudinal rising.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".