MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2375331622

Research on influencing factors of trichloroethylene(TCE) anaerobic degradation granular sludge

2014· article· en· W2375331622 on OpenAlexaff
Yin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueDongbei Nongye Daxue xuebao · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrichloroethyleneDegradation (telecommunications)Anaerobic exerciseChemistryBiodegradationPulp and paper industryBlanketEnvironmental chemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acclimation of trichloroethylene(TCE)-degrading anaerobic granular sludge was successful by using upflow anaerobic sludge blanket(UASB) reactor. The influences of temperature, p H and initial concentration of TCE on the degradation characteristics of TCE-degrading anaerobic granular sludge were investigated in serum bottles. The results showed that 35 ℃ was the optimum temperature of the granular sludge, the degradation rate constant was 0.1879, the half-life was 3.69 d, and the TCE degradation rate was 90.15%; 7.2 was the optimum p H of granular sludge, the degradation rate constant was 0.1672, the halflife was 4.15 d, and the TCE degradation rate was 88.74%; Under the conditions of temperature of 35 ℃, p H of 7.2, and the TCE test concentration range from 14.6 to 73.0 mg · L-1, the smaller the initial TCE concentration was, the faster the degradation rate was; When TCE concentration was 73 mg · L-1, TCEdegrading anaerobic granular sludge still had higher ability to degrade TCE. After 14 d, TCE could be effectively removed and the final TCE degradation rate was over 80%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDongbei Nongye Daxue xuebaoSame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207