EVALUATION OF REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY OF ECOLOGICAL COMSUMPTION BASED ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN HUNAN PROVINCE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Humans consume the products and services of nature,every one of us has an impact on the earth.Evaluation of ecological sustainability reveals the base line of capacity of regional sustainable development.The issues concerned to this field involve not only to investigate the background of environment,but to understand the behavior modes of society.Canadian ecological economists initiatively bring forward the method of Ecological footprint to assess the sustainability of human consumption by comparing with the ecological carrying capacity.It is a useful indicator for measuring the pressure imposed by human on nature capital and also a powerful indicator for regional sustainability.This article describes the method and use for reference to estimate the ecological carrying capacity and the total ecological consumption of Hunan Province.Based on the ecological footprint method,the reasult show that the per capita deficit of ecological footprint was 1.2082 per capita in 2004,and the development at present is disadvantageous for achieving sustainable development.In the end,the author put forward some suggests for promote regional sustainability and relative policies goal,so as to realize the aim of regional sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it