Observation on 56 Cases with Chronic Urticaria Treated by Acupoint Catgut Embedding Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To observe the curative effect on chronic urticaria with acupoint catgut embedding therapy.Method.Methods: 112 patients with chronic urticaria patients were randomly divided into treatment group(n=56) and control group(n=56).Patients in the treatment group were treated with acupoint catgut embedding therapy.And patients in the control group were treated by Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride Tablets and point injection with Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Injection.The patients are treated for 45 days consecutively,and a follow-up study was conducted on the Forty-sixth days and Ninetieth days after the end of treatment to observe the curative effect,recurernce rate and adverse reaction.Results: The treatment group achieved 73.2%,19.5% and 1.8% respectively in effectiveness,recurernce rate and adverse reaction,and that of the control group are 71.4%,57.5%,and 8.9%.There is no statistic difference between the two groups in effectiveness and adverse reaction(P0.05),while there is significant statistic difference(P0.01) in recurernce rate.Conclusion: The effectiveness and adverse reaction of treating chronic urticaria with acupoint catgut embedding therapy and Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride Tablets and point injection with Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Injection are similar,but acupoint catgut embedding therapycan provide longer lasting effect and lower recurernce rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".