MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376008324 · doi:10.2310/6650.2005.00205.70

71 ENHANCED EXTERNAL COUNTERPULSATION IMPROVES MICROVASCULAR ANGINA IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

2005· article· en· W2376008324 on OpenAlex
Kenneth D. Kronhaus, William E. Lawson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Investigative Medicine · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyInternal medicineAnginaCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial perfusion imagingFractional flow reserveAngioplastyIschemiaAngiographyCoronary angiographyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Enhanced external counterpulsation has been demonstrated to improve angina in patients with epicardial coronary disease (CAD) and in patients with microvascular angina without CAD. However, epicardial CAD and microvascular disease may coexist in the same patient and cause refractory angina. Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) may be of general utility in treating angina from either cause. <h3>Methods</h3> Coronary artery disease patients with refractory angina and a positive imaging stress test for regional ischemia in an area with normal perfusion by angiography were considered for inclusion. CAD included prior angioplasty, bypass surgery or catheterization demonstrating ≥ 50% stenosis of a major epicardial artery. Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class was assessed at baseline and after completion of a course of EECP (1 hour/day for a total of 35 hours). A follow-up imaging stress test was performed within 6 months of completing EECP. Statistical testing pre and post was performed by paired Student9s t test with significance at p&lt;0.05. <h3>Results</h3> There were 15 patients (8 male, average age 67.6 ± 11.5 years), all of whom completed a 35-hour course of EECP. The CCS angina class improved from an average of 3.7 ± 0.5 to 1.8 ± 0.8 post therapy (p&lt;0.05) with 14/15 improving ≥ 1 angina class. Post EECP imaging stress tests obtained in 11 patients demonstrated improvement/ resolution in ischemia in all the clinically improved patients (p&lt;0.05). At an average follow-up of 4.9 ± 2.9 months, angina relief was maintained in all initially responding patients with an average angina class of 1.7 ± 0.9 (p&lt;0.05). In intermediate term follow-up one patient developed worsening angina at 6.5 months and a second worsening angina at 8 months. Long term follow-up of up to 27.5 months has demonstrated persistent improvement in angina class in 12/15 patients. <h3>Conclusions</h3> EECP is an effective treatment for CAD patients with microvascular angina. Given its effectiveness in improving angina in patients with microvascular and epicardial CAD, EECP may be considered appropriate for any patient with refractory angina and demonstrable ischemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it