MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376060708

The clinical use of somatostatin,somatotropin and nutritional support in early definitive surgery for enterocutaneous fistulas

2004· article· en· W2376060708 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Dao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal Surgery and Complications
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnterocutaneous fistulaMedicineSomatostatinSurgeryParenteral nutritionFistulaAnastomosisGastrointestinal functionAbdominal surgeryGeneral surgeryInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The effect of somatostatin,somatotropin and early definitive surgery for enterocutaneous fistulas was determined. Methods: 22 patients with small intestinal external fistulas consisted of 13 males and 9 females. 20 patients had one fistula and 2 patients had two or more fistulas.The causes of the fistula included abdominal injury(10),gynecological procedures(3),appentectomy(5)and other intestinal procedures(4).The time between definitive surgery and previous operation or trauma was 6~97 hours and 15 patients was 48 hours or shorter. 21 patients was resection of enterocutaneous fistulas and anastomosis by hand absorble suture,and enterocutaneous fistula was repaired simply in one patient. The combination of somatostatin, somatotropin and nutrition support was given in all patients postoperatively. Results: All patients were cured and no enterocutaneous fistulas was observed.The gastrointestinal function restored after(9.6±5.9)days and oral feeding restored(13.1±6.2)days after reoperation. Conclusions: With somatostatin,somatotropin and nutrition support,early definitive surgery can be performed safely and effectively for enterocutaneous fistulas of small intestine even with severe intra abdominal sepsis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAbdominal Surgery and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207