Study on Phenotypic Diversity of Seeds and Cones Characteristics in Pinus tabuleaformis Carr.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Totally 10 natural population of Pinus tabuleaformis Carr.were collected.Eight characteristics,in cluding seed length(SL),seed width(SW),seed hight (SH)cone length(CL),cone width(CW ),weight(TGW) of 1000 seeds were measured.The variance analysis of the five characteristics showed that there were signifcant differences among populations and among families within a population.The variation among populations,that is the mean phenotypic differentiation coefficient was 51.86% and bigger than that within populations(48.14%).The variation among a population was the main part of the phenotypic variation in Pinus tabuleaformis.In different individuals within populations,the CV of cone length,cone width,cone length/cone width,seed length,seed width,seed hight seed length/seed width,1000 seeds weight was 12.87%,12.43%,11.19%,13.97%,16.92%,18.8%,11.53% and 32.50%,respectively.According to the UPGMA cluster analysis,the 10 populations could be divided into four groups.There was a greatly positive correlation between seed length/seed width and latitude and altitude and EGA.There was a greatly negative correlation between seed length/seed width and annual average temperature and preciptation and growth period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".