MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376245102

Study on Sensitive Part of Yam Bulbil to Paclobutrazol and Allelopathy of Yam Bulbil

2012· article· en· W2376245102 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xuemei Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Quality and Safety Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationPaclobutrazolDormancySignificant differenceBiologyHorticultureBotanyChemistryMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to study the sensitive section of yam bulbils to paclobutrazol(PP333),different concentration(10 mg/L,100 mg/L and 1 000 mg/L) of PP333 were stabbed into the top,the middle and the base of bulbils with a needle,then the effect of different treatments on the germination rate was studied.The germination rate of Chinese cabbage seeds treated with the extract from the base and the top of dormant bulbils and germinating bulbils was tested,so as to find whether restricting matters in the bulbils.The results showed that the germination rate of the bulbils treated at the base and the top was same as the control.The bulbils treated at the middle were promoted to germinate,and the more concentrated PP333 solution the better the effect.The extract from neither dormant bulbils nor germination bulbils restrained Chinese cabbage seeds germination,the surprising result was that the extract from the base of dormant bulbils promoted the seeds germinating extremely significantly.The results indicate that bulbil dormancy did not result from the restricting germination matter,stabbing bulbils with PP333 promoted the bulbil germinating,and the sensitive part of bulbil to paclobutrazol was the middle part.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.395
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicFood Quality and Safety StudiesFrench-language works237,207