MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376357071

Experimental study of the later water intrusion effects on the gas desorption

2011· article· en· W2376357071 on OpenAlexaff
Guo‐Hua Zhang, Liang Bing

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesorptionCoalIntrusionAdsorptionPermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringExtraction (chemistry)Coal miningChemistryMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyChromatographyGeochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper takes its aim at introducing the results of our experimental study of the later water intrusion effects on the coal-mine gas desorption.As is known,in order to improve the gas extraction efficiency through gas desorption,it is necessary to increase the coal bed permeability by way of hydraulic fracturing,and,for this purpose, we have proposed and invented our own gas desorption-measuring device under the condition of external solution intrusion and conducted the related contrast experiments.The experiments suggested are totally made up of such gas adsorption balance pressure experiments, as 3.5 MPa,3.0 MPa,2.5 MPa,2.0 MPa,1.5 MPa,1.0 MPa,and the environmental pressure experiments,respectively,as 3.0 MPa,2.5 MPa,2.0 MPa,1.5 MPa,1.0 MPa,0.5 MPa, whose internal and external pressure difference lies in 0.5 MPa. Through the six group contrast experiments,we have gained the related experimental data and six groups of gas accumulation desorption contrast change curves.The analysis results show that:after the hydraulic fracture of the gas-latent coal,the external water later intrusion can not only help to greatly reduce the gas-desorbed coal quantity, but also can facilitate the end lime of gas desorption come earlier. Furthermore,provided that the internal and external pressure difference can reach 0.5 MPa,the gas desorption amount of coal after water intrusion is only 23%- 45%as compared to that without water intrusion,merely 67.5%of that was before on average.At the same time,the end time of gas desorption would come ahead about 1 h because it helps to get rid of the likely damage coming from the water in pores in forming the capillary resistance.Therefore,in evaluating whether to adopt hydraulic fracture to increase coal bed permeability and improve gas extraction efficiency,it is necessary to take into consideration the three aspects when dealing with the problem of coal bed permeability,that is,water-driving gas,water damaging effects on the gas desorption,and ways for enhancing the gas extraction efficiency. Thus,the present study is certain of its due reference worth for heightening the gas extraction efficiency via hydraulic fracture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207