MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376366107

Significance of Conduit of Sulfide-Bearing Magma for Exploration of Magmatic Sulfide Deposit

2005· article· en· W2376366107 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xie‐Yan Song, Lie-Meng Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Mineralogy Petrology and Geochemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfideGeologyGeochemistryMagmaProspectingVolcanogenic massive sulfide ore depositBearing (navigation)Magma chamberVolcanoMetallurgyPyriteSphaleriteMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magmatic Ni-Cu sulfide deposits formed by injecting of sulfide-bearing magmas segregated at depthare hosted in intrusions with high proportions of sulfide ores. The lithologic variations and distribution of sulfide orebodies in the intrusions are inconsistent with model of in-situ magmatic fractionation and sulfide segregation. Many such deposits had been identified in China. However, corresponding method for further exploration of the ore bodies in depth in these deposits has not been developed well. In this paper, we summarized marked geological features of this type of deposits in China, including the Jinchuan deposit. Exploration of the Voisey's Bay super-large Cu-Co-Ni sulfide deposit in Canada, which is genetically similar to the Jinchuan deposit, was described. We proposed that it is potential to prospect new ore-bodies along sulfide-bearing magma conduit at depth. We also presented method prospecting new ore bodies along the conduit of sulfide-bearing magmas in the Jinchuan deposit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Mineralogy Petrology and GeochemistrySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207