Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Zooplankton in the Jiaozhou Bay
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the planktons sampled in the Jiaozhou Bay during the time period from January to De-cember 2003,totally 71species of zooplankton and 34groups of plankton larvae are identified.The spatial-temporal distribution and variation of the species,and their relationships to the environmental factors of the sea area are analyzed.As it is shown by the results from the analysis and the comparison with the his-torical data,the zooplankton species diversity is in accordance with the general rule of the zooplankton dis-tribution in the mid-latitude bay waters.The ecological attributes is mainly of the in-shore and low-salt species of the warm temperate zone.Zooplankton biomass and abundance vary from season to season.The annual mean biomass is 84.28mg/m3,the mean nutrimental zooplankton abundance is 531.76ind/m3,and the counterpart of non-nutrimental zooplankton 72.08ind/m3.The seasonal variation of the zooplankton biomass and the nutrimental zoolankton abundance accords with that of the water temperature.It is evi-denced from the regression analysis for the correlative factors that they can be more closely related to the temperature variation.The temporal-spatial distribution of zooplankton and the species diversity do not va-ry much and maintain a similar variation in the recent 20years.Although there is temporal difference a-mong the annual peak times of the biomass and abundance,it can be attributed to the temperature abnor-mality in the inter-annual variation and the seasonal variation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it