MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376656713 · doi:10.1142/s0219633616500346

Computational (DFT and MP2) and spectral interpretations, normal coordinate analysis, force constants and barriers to internal rotations of Trimethylacetonitrile

2016· article· en· W2376656713 on OpenAlexaff
Tarek A. Mohamed, Ibrahim A. Shaaban, Usama A. Soliman, Lee D. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConformational isomerismBasis setPhysicsCrystallographyMoleculeQuantum mechanicsCombinatoricsChemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Raman (3500[Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text]100[Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text] and IR spectra (4000[Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text]400[Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text] of liquid trimethylacetonitrile (C5H9N, TMA) have been obtained. In addition, the1H and [Formula: see text]C NMR spectra of TMA were obtained in DMSO-[Formula: see text] and CDCl3. The staggered conformer (C[Formula: see text] was favored using MP2 and DFT(B3LYP/[Formula: see text]B97XD) quantum mechanical calculations utilizing a 6-311[Formula: see text]G(d,p) basis set. High energy difference estimates of 4534[Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text]5338[Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text] (12.96[Formula: see text]kcal/mol[Formula: see text]15.26[Formula: see text]kcal/mol) were predicted, along with three imaginary torsion frequencies for the eclipsed conformer, therefore considered a transition state. The1H and [Formula: see text]C NMR chemical shifts were predicted with B3LYP and [Formula: see text]B97XD methods using the GIAO approximation and 6-311[Formula: see text]G(d,p) basis set. B3LYP frequencies calculation is favored herein owing to the relatively good compilation with the experimental measurements. The computed structural parameters are well correlated to those reported from electron diffraction and microwave studies. Moreover, the [Formula: see text]C[Formula: see text]H coupling constant was estimated and found consistent with that observed for the sample dissolved in DMSO-[Formula: see text]/CDCl3solvents. Using the observed methyl torsion at 266[Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text] in gas phase and the kinetic parameter F number, a potential function (V[Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text][Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text]([Formula: see text][Formula: see text]kcal/mol) was obtained, this barrier to internal rotation is well correlated to 1527[Formula: see text]cm[Formula: see text] (4.37[Formula: see text]kcal/mol) predicted from MP2/6-311[Formula: see text]G(d,p) potential surface scan. Aided by the predicted wavenumbers and their IR intensity/Raman activity, the observed IR/Raman bands were intensively discussed and therefore assigned to their corresponding fundamentals, in agreement with novel normal coordinate analysis and potential energy distributions (PEDs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Theoretical and Computational ChemistrySame topicMolecular spectroscopy and chiralityFrench-language works237,207