MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2376953004

Sustained Epidemic and Transient Oscillations of Schistosome Infection in Multiple Vertebrate Hosts

2003· article· en· W2376953004 on OpenAlexaff
Li A

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomathematics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEvolution and Genetic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyVertebrateTransmission (telecommunications)Extinction (optical mineralogy)TrematodaHost (biology)MatingFlatwormTransient (computer programming)EcologyZoologyHelminthsComputer sciencePaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schistosomes are parasitic worms, related to the flatworm, which live in the digestive tract or vascular system of their vertebrate hosts. They have a complex life cycle, which includes both an intermediate rnolluscan (or snail) and a vertebrate host. We derive a dynamical model based on the early work of MacDonald and of May and incorporated more time delays to account for various times required during the life cycle of a schistosome. Our model involves a mating function proposed by May and Woolhouse, and our work shows that varying a parameter in the mating function, which represents a disputed aspect of schistosome behavior, can change the structure of equilibria and the transmission dynamics from sustained epidemic to extinction of the infection. We also show that long lasting transient oscillations of the transmission can be observed by varying the initial average load of paired schistosomes and the initial number of infected and shedding snails. In particular, we illustrate that the average load of paired schistosomes can remain well below its epidemic level for quite a long time before it rises and monotonically approaches the epidemi level. This suggests that prediction of the infection extinction should not be based on the level of paired schistosomes over a short priod of time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BiomathematicsSame topicEvolution and Genetic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207