MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2377088999

Impact of Aspen BCTMP Applying to Wood-Free LWC on its Performance

2007· article· en· W2377088999 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChina Pulp & Paper · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaterial Properties and Processing
Canadian institutionsTembec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGloss (optics)HardwoodKraft processMaterials scienceKraft paperComposite materialPorosityPulp and paper industryCoated paperSurface roughnessUltimate tensile strengthPulp (tooth)CoatingEngineeringBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Substituting BCTMP for chemical pulps,such as bleached hardwood kraft pulp in many paper grades is in rising demand for reducing cost and improving product performance.In this paper we investigated the effect of substituting aspen BCTMP for hardwood kraft pulp(varying from 10% to 30%)on product performance of light weight coated paper.The results showed that the tensile index increases and other strength properties are essentially unchanged as the substitution level increases.The surface roughness of the base paper increases slightly with the BCTMP substitution level,while coating coverage of the base paper is not affected significantly.The increased BCTMP substitution results in an increase in porosity of the base paper,but does not change the average pore diameter.Increasing BCTMP substitution level leads to a slight decrease in gloss and,an increase in surface roughness of the coated paper,however the latter can be compensated by a higher nip-load calendaring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it