Characteristic of Ceratoides arboresens Pollen Germination and Effects of Different Pollination Modes on Seed Setting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to seek causes that seed setting rate of Ceratoides arboresens is low,Study of relativity among pollen viability,pollen life.Pollen germination rate and the seed setting was conducted under the cultivation in this paper By and adopting three pollination treatments including geitonogam,xenogamous and natural pollination,we found that Geitonogam seed setting rate(81.53%) was significant lower than xenogamous(88.6%)and natural pollination(92.6%).Using TTC dyeing determine Ceratoides arboresens fresh pollen viability and pollen life.The results show that pollen viability was 95% and pollen life can last 6 days.The best pollination time can last 1-3 days.It does not have question such as the pollen abortion and short lives.It does not have microspore growth barrier.Using fluorescence microscopy,pollen germination rate in three pollination modes was observed.The germination peak concentrates after pollination 3-4 h.The germination rate reaches 90% above.The results show that three pollination modes were not significant differences.Ceratoides arboresens does not have the pollen and stigma recognition barrier.The results show that there was no correlation between seed setting rate and pollen germination rate.It was concluded that Geitonogam reproduction barrier happened in pollination or embryonic development process.This remained to be further studied At present,There existed serious degeneration of wild population and mass reduce of vegetation density in Ceratoides arboresens,It could be concluded that Geitonogam was one of the important reasons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".