MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2378741507

Premedication of Muscle Relaxant for Non-Urgency Intubation in Prematurity

2009· article· en· W2378741507 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cheng Rui

Bibliographic record

VenueTestowy IndexCopernicus · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAirway Management and Intubation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPremedicationMedicineAnesthesiaFentanylIntubationGroup BAtropineGroup AMuscle relaxantSurgeryInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the safety and efficiency of using Succinylcholine as premedication for non-urgency intubation in prematurity.Methods During Jan.to Jul.2007,in Ottawa General Hospital and Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario NICU,the prematurity who were received non-urgency intubation were divided into 2 groups as premedication group(group A)and non-premedication group(group B).Premedications in group A were applied Atropine,Fentanyl and Succinylcholine;premedications in group B were applied Atropine and Fentanyl.The same procedures were done according to the protocol in 2 groups.The basical information,one attempt successful intubation,total attempts,Goldberg scores and side effects were compared between both groups.Results Forty-four cases were involved in the study,25 cases in group A,19 cases in group B,there was no significant difference in patients' basical information between both groups.One attempt successful intubation was 56.0%(14 cases)in group A,higher than that in group B [21.1%(4 cases)],which had significant diffe-rence between 2 groups(P0.05).Average attempts of each patient in group A(1.8±1.3)was lower than that in group B(2.5±1.3),Goldberg score in group A(4.3±2.0)was lower than that in group B(4.7±1.8),mouth or nose bleeding in group A [5 cases(20.0%)] was higher than that in group B[2 cases(10.5%)],bradyrhythmia(heart rate100 times per minute)in group A[24.0%(6 cases)] was lower than that in group B[31.6%(6 cases)],desatuation(80%)in group A [64.0%(16 cases)]was lower than that in group B[78.9%(15 cases)],hard bagging in group A[12.0%(3 cases)] was lower than that in group B[31.6%(6 cases)],but there were no significant differences between both groups(Pa0.05).Conclusions Atropine,Fentanyl and Succinylcholine are safe as the premedication used in prematurity,which can improve one attempt successful intubation avoiding glottal injury of repeating attempts.It also can helps young physician to be familiar with the intubation techniques,premedication is recommended to teaching hospital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTestowy IndexCopernicusSame topicAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207