Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the cognitive impairment and the related factors in patients after first lacunar infarct(LI).Methods96 patients with LI and 40 controls were assessed with mini-mental state examination(MMSE),digit span test(DST),verbal fluency test(VFT)and clock drawing test(CDT).ResultsThe scores of MMSE,DST,VFT and CDT were significantly lower in LI group than in control group(P0.05).Cognitive impairment occurred in 37(38.5%)patients with LI after first stroke.The scores of MMSE,DST,VFT and CDT were lower in the patients with multiple infarcts than with single infarct(P0.05),and lower in patients with infarcts affecting the frontal lobe,thalamus and basal ganglia than affecting other area(P0.05).The scores of MMSE were lower in the patients with prior vascular risk factors than without risk factors(P0.05).ConclusionLacunar infarction usually leads to cognitive impairment.Cognitive function is associated with multiple infarcts,lesions affecting the frontal lobe,thalamus and basal ganglia and those with prior vascular risk factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".