ANALYSIS ON GEOLOGICAL ORIGIN OF ANCIENT ACCUMULATION BODY GROUP AT UPPER REACHES OF JINSHA RIVER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accumulation body group is an aggregate of accumulations.It can be seen everywhere along the upper reaches of Jinsha river.It is a big problem to limit the progress of hydropower development at this area.This paper examines the problem using a project of a hydropower station at upper reaches of Jinsha river.This place is strongly affected by geological structure and climate.The ancient accumulation body group lies on the right bank of the upper reaches of Jinsha river.Its size is almost three million tons and its geological structure and origin can not be certain.It is located just only about one kilometer distance to the hydropower station.So it will be a big problem of the hydropower project.Three methods are applied to analyze the problem in this paper.They are topographic feature analysis,rock structure theory,and analogy analysis.Finally,four results are achieved.(1) on the basis of topographic feature,the accumulation group can be divided into four domains.(2) Comprehensive topographic and geological structure feature analysis results are achieved that river blocking had happened at this area.(3) the product period of domain Ⅰ is earlier than the other domains.However,the river blocking was not happened during the period of domain I production.The production of domain Ⅰ just made the river diversion.(4) the structure of domain Ⅱ have a separation grade feature from up to down.This is a typical character belong to debris flow.So the conclusion is that the domain Ⅱ was come from anti-shore.The true river blocking was happened after the domain Ⅱ production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".