Investigation and Analysis on Status of Health Quotient of Graduating Students of Different Specialties in a Military Medical University
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the status of health quotient(HQ)of the graduating students of different specialties in a military medical university for identifying their health problems and provide health guidance for them.Methods A total of 169 graduating students in the military medical university were interviewed with the health quotient questionnaire designed by Chinese Canadian professor Wah-Jun Tze.The data was statistically analyzed by SPSS 11.0.Results Results showed 5.88%,75.82% and 18.30% of the subjects' HQ total scores were ideal,relatively ideal and alarming respectively.29.79% and 23.81% students in anesthesiology and pharmacy got warning scores.There were significant differences in the scores of self care,health knowledge,living skills and health behaviors(P0.05).Conclusion The HQ total scores of the subjects are generally relatively ideal,but the scores of students in anesthesiology and pharmacy are relatively low.The teachers should aim to fulfill the HQ absence aspects of the graduating students and conduct health education for them.It's recommended to enhance health education of HQ for students and strengthen their awareness of mental health and self care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".