Resistance of Triticum durum Cultivars Waskana and Waskowa to Cereal Cyst Nematode,Heterodera filipjevi and H. avenae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cereal cyst nematodes (CCN) are a group of important soil-borne pathogens of wheat. Heterodera avenae and H. filip-jevi are the major species of CCN that have limited wheat (Triticum aestivum) production in China in recent years. Since the CCN-resistant resource is short, it is important to develop new sources with resistance for breeding purpose in China. Based on the results of a 3-year field test and controlled environment tests, we found that two Canadian Triticum durum cultivars, Waskana and Waskowa, were highly resistant to both Heterodera filipjevi (pathotype Hfc-1) and H. avenae (pathotype HA43) populations from Henan Province, China. The number of white females per plant in Waskana and Waskowa was significantly smaller than that in the susceptible common wheat cultivars Aikang 58, Shi 4185, and Wenmai 19. Although the juveniles of H. filipjevi and H. avenae populations were able to penetrate into the roots of Waskana and Waskowa, the number of juveniles inside the roots was significantly smaller than that of Aikang 58, Shi 4185, and Wenmai 19, resulting in smaller numbers of females on the roots of these durum wheat cultivars. Waskana and Waskowa with resistance to H. filipjevi and H. avenae are useful in developing wheat cultivars with enhanced resistance to CCN in China. Based on the results from the DNA-based soil testing service operated by South Australian Research and Development Institute, the number of eggs of nematodes in the rhizospheric soil samples from the CCN-resistant cultivars Waskana and Waskowa was less than that in the soil samples from the susceptible wheat cultivars. This indicates that application of resistant cultivars might reduce the risk of damage caused by CCN in soil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".