Reviews of the Outpatient Prescriptions and Analysis of the Rational Drug Use in Kaifeng Maternity and Children Health Hospital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the outpatient prescription in accordance with Management Methodso as to improve the level of rational use of drug. METHODS: A total of 1 800 outpatient prescriptions randomly collected in Kaifeng Maternity and Children Health Hospital in the fourth quarter during 2011-2013 were reviewed,evaluated and analyzed in accordance with Hospital Prescription Review Management Practices( Trial) .RESULTS: In the forth quarter of 2011,2012 and 2013,and average of 2. 42,2. 38 and 2. 32 drugs were prescribed per prescription,with antibiotic use prescribed in 45. 50%,35. 83% and 27. 33%,injections prescribed in 40. 17%,31. 17% and 26. 33%,essential drugs prescribed in 61. 58%,65. 59% and 72. 25%,generic drug name use in99. 70%,99. 75%,99. 86%, average drug cost per prescription of 86. 77 yuan,76. 35 yuan,64. 50 yuan,component ratio of 45. 71%,32. 62%,28. 63% in terms of outpatient drug consumption sum in the total,rate of rational prescriptions of 92. 17%,93. 33% and 95. 67%,respectively. CONCLUSION: Through review on the outpatient prescriptions,both the quality of prescriptions and the rational level of drug use have been improved significantly,which can help ensure medication safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".