MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2380091297

The Association of the Social Relationships CAP with Depression in Psychiatric In-patients: An Outcome Study

2010· dissertation· en· W2380091297 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rannveig Tholl Thorsdottir

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)Depression (economics)PsychiatryOutcome (game theory)PsychologyMedicineClinical psychologyPsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Depression is a worldwide problem but studies have shown that after patients with depressive symptoms are in remission, difficulties in social relationships may persist. There is a need for future research on the relationship between social function and depressive symptoms in order to facilitate development of new clinical interventions. \n Objectives: This study aimed to identify what factors contribute to the relationship between depressive symptoms and social relationships and what factors predict improvement in depressive symptoms during psychiatric hospitalization. \nMethods: This longitudinal cohort study was based on a secondary analysis of RAI-MH data from the Ontario Mental Health Reporting System (OMHRS). Depressive symptoms were measured with the Depressive Symptoms Rating Scale (DRS) and social relationships difficulties were evaluated with the interRAI Social Relationships CAP. The sample comprised of 125,120 patients from acute, long stay, addiction, psychiatric crisis units and forensic units. Sub-sample of patients with depressive symptoms and mood disorder was created (N = 38,823). Results presented in a descriptive analysis for both samples and bivariate and multivariate analysis for the sub-sample. Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict rates of improvement of depressive symptoms. \nResults: The study revealed that many factors predict outcome of depressive symptoms. Difficulties in social relationships, older age, multi-morbidity, functional impairments, trauma, and poor physical health predict decreased odds of improvements but longer hospital stay, individual therapy and family/couples therapy predict increased odds of improvements. Conclusions: The interRAI Social Relationships CAP provides a valuable tool to address social issues in patient care, assist clinical staff in care planning and provide mental health authorities information for policy making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicMental Health Treatment and Access→French-language works237,207→