Study on the Dynamics of Endogenous Hormones at Seed Development of Six Grasses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4 kinds of endogenous hormones were compared in the seed development of the six species of rhizomatous grasses.The results showed that there were significantly differences in endogenous hormones of appearing time and contents in seed development and in species.The peak value of 4 kinds endogenous hormones contents has distinct order in appearing time and has the same law in different grasses.The peak of GA and ABA appeared firstly in 8-14 d,the second was IAA(11-23 d),the last was ZR(11-33 d),The content is different but change law is same in species.The peak value of 4 kinds endogenous hormones contents were different in endogenous hormones and species,the peak value of GA content is the lowest(15-35 ng/g)(FW),then was IAA(35-91 ng/g)(FW),the highest was ZR(104-129 ng/g)(FW),The peak value of ABA content varied with a great scope in 43-113 ng/g(FW).The content of hormones in 6 rhizomatous grasses had significantly difference,and the species with long rhizome were significantly higher than the ones with short rhizome.The change of hormones has the same model in development of the seeds of 6 rhizomatous grasses,which is that the content decreased with the development,and the content of later period were lower than the former ones.The change model of positive hormone is a curve with two peaks,but the passive ones with more peaks.The hormone ratio of positive to passive was also a same change model,increasing with development,and the later content was higher than the former.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".