Study on new model of five elements’ generation and restriction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the first time,this paper discovered the limitations of the five elements' normal generation and normal restriction model.It doesn't specify the relationships between five elements and Yin-Yang,and the essence and operations of five elements.It also cannot explain the ten pairs of generation interactions among the normal five zang-organ functions,the generation and restriction interaction phenomenon between two normal generation zang-organs under pathological conditions,and the restriction interaction between two normal restriction zang-organs under pathological conditions.Based on the seven-yao Yin-Yang and heaven and human combining-into-one,a new model of five element generation and restriction was established.There exists a generation and restriction interaction to each other between any of the two elements.When the generation interaction between the vicinal elements aligns with the direction of the periodic cancellation and increase of Yin-Yang,it is called as normal generation.When the restriction interaction between the separated elements is consistent with the direction of the periodic cancellation and increase of Yin-Yang,it is called as normal restriction.There are 10 pairs of normal generations and 10 pairs of normal restrictions among five elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".