Study on new model of five elements’ generation and restriction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the first time,this paper discovered the limitations of the five elements' normal generation and normal restriction model.It doesn't specify the relationships between five elements and Yin-Yang,and the essence and operations of five elements.It also cannot explain the ten pairs of generation interactions among the normal five zang-organ functions,the generation and restriction interaction phenomenon between two normal generation zang-organs under pathological conditions,and the restriction interaction between two normal restriction zang-organs under pathological conditions.Based on the seven-yao Yin-Yang and heaven and human combining-into-one,a new model of five element generation and restriction was established.There exists a generation and restriction interaction to each other between any of the two elements.When the generation interaction between the vicinal elements aligns with the direction of the periodic cancellation and increase of Yin-Yang,it is called as normal generation.When the restriction interaction between the separated elements is consistent with the direction of the periodic cancellation and increase of Yin-Yang,it is called as normal restriction.There are 10 pairs of normal generations and 10 pairs of normal restrictions among five elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it