[The cytotoxicity of Her-2 pulsed DCIKS against breast cancer cells].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To study DCIK co-culture system with Her-2 as the pulsing antigen peptide of DC and the cytotoxicity of DCIKs against the breast cancer cells, CIK and DC were first induced and isolated from human peripheral blood. CIK and DC pulsed with antigen Her-2 peptide were then co-cultured to prepare CIK-DC co-culture system (DCIK-P). Using DCIK-P as effect cells and breast tumor cells (MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, MCF-7) as target cells,the antigen-specicfic cytotox-icity of DCIK-P was analysed by cell viability and cytotoxicity assay. The killer activity of DCIKs against the MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3 and MCF-7 is 50.38% +/- 3.25%, 52.19% +/- 3.25% and 47.09% +/- 2.41% respectively. The killer activity of DCIK-Ps against the MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3 and MCF-7 is 76.30% +/- 1.74% (P < 0.001), 55.70% +/- 3.05% (P = 0.014) and 47.67% +/- 2.40% (P = 0.697) respectively. The killer activity of DCIK-P cells was greatly enhanced against Her-2(+) breast tumor cell strains. The present results can provide tumor immunological data and experimental techniques for the development of breast tumor treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".