Structural characteristics and physical modeling of Fusha-Keliyang segment of the western Kunlun thrust belt in southwestern Tarim Basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The establishment of seismic structural models has been great difficulty in the petroleum exploration of southwestern Tarim Basin due to complicated surface conditions.The fine structural interpretation and growth formation analysis of 2D seismic sections in Fusha-Keliyang segment were performed based on outcrop survey,2D seismic data and drilling materials.The result shows that structural types of the western Kunlun foreland thrust belt mainly include thick-skinned structure,Alberta-style triangle zone,passive-roof double-thrust structure and fault-bend fold.Furthermore,three rows of anticlinal structure belts in the piedmont zone of the western Kunlun mountain developed from south to north in Early Pliocene,Middle-Late Pliocene and Early-Middle Pleistocene,respectively.On the basis of the foregoing result,a double-decollement plus unidirectional compressing pattern was put forward with respect to the formation of the western Kunlun thrust belt in the southwestern Tarim Basin.A sandbox physical modeling experiment was accordingly designed and carried out.The experimental result indicates that the double-decollement plus unidirectional compressing pattern can be able to better simulate the deformation process and typical structure style of Fusha-Keliyang segment in the western Kunlun thrust belt and the physical simulation fundamentally coincides well with seismic structural interpretation.In addition,both the intensive northward compression created by the lift of the western Kunlun orogenic zone and the double-decollement stratigraphic framework are the two important factors for the formation of Fusha-Keliyang structural segment in the western Kunlun thrust belt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".