MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2380615697

Chancelloriids from Late Middle Cambrian of Huayuan,Hunan,South China

2003· article· en· W2380615697 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhu Caifa

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSponge spiculePaleontologyGeologyAssemblage (archaeology)ChinaGeographyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Chancelloriids were recovered from dark grey thin-bedded micrites and bioclastic micrites of the upper Middle Cambrian Huaqiao Formation at the Paibi section in Huayuan County,Hunan Province,China.About 40 samples with diverse sclerites have been identified,including Chancelloria altaica with 6-7+1 ray patterns,Archiasterlla sp.with 4+0 ray patterns and Allonnia sp.with 3+0 ray patterns as well as Chancelloria sp.with peculiar sclerite patterns.In addition to chancelloriids,these chancelloriid-bearing rocks,yield abundant and diverse trilobites,conodonts,hyolithids,hyolithellids,brachiopods,sponge spicules and ornamented tubular fossils.Compared with the materials reported from the Cambrian of Australia,Northwestern Canada,Western Argentina,West Africa and Iran etc.,it is indicated that the Hunan assemblage is the latest records of Middle Cambrian chancelloriids in China and is one of a few higher horizons of occurrence of chancelloriids recovered in the world.Based on analysis of sclerite structure,preservation and the stratigraphic distributions of chancelloriids,the authors support the opinion that the chancelloriid may belong to a group of extinct metazoans which is closer to Porifera,in the systematic phylogenetic position.It probably represents a sessile animal which adapted to shallow sea environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis PekinesisSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207