Effects of Different Sources of Brown Rice Supplemented by Exogenous Enzymes of Weanling Pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the effects of different sources of brown rice supplemented by exogenous enzymes on digestibility of phosphorus of weanling pigs,six healthy barrows,average initial body weight of (12.5±0.60) kg,were fitted with a T-cannula and fed fresh and stored brown rice according to a 6 × 6 Latin square design.There were altogether six kinds of brown rice based diets with one supplemented by exogenous emzyme combination 1,one supplemented by exogenous emzyme combination 2 and the others not supplemented by any exogenous emzyme,respectively.The result suggests that sources of brown rice,different sources of brown rice supplemented by exogenous enzymes and exogenous emzyme combinations have no effect on apparent and true ileal and fecal phosphorus digestibility values and phytate phosphorus degradability values in weanling pigs.The true ileal and fecal phosphorus digestibility values are 13.90% and 12.41% higher than the apparent ileal and fecal phosphorus digestibility values,respectively.There were no differences in true P digestibility values between the ileal and the fecal levels.The ileal phytate phosphorus degradability values are significantly lower than the fecal phytate phosphorus values.The large intestine does not play a major role in the absorption of exogenous phosphorus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".