Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three samples of alfalfa(Medicago sative L)seeds with different germination level were used in the experiment and conducted to analyse the effect of the aging temperature(39,41,43,45℃)and aging duration(24,36,48,60,72,84,96h)on the germination percentage,and to find out the suitable condition and procedure for the accelerated aging test of alfalfa seed.The results showed that the germination rate decreased gradually with the ageing temperature increasing,and germination rate after ageing was decreased significantly(p0.05)at 45℃.The seed germination of Lot1,Lot2 and Lot3 gradually decreased with the ageing duration prolonging,but there were not significant differen(p0.05)from ageing duration 36h to 84h.Although ageing temperature could promote the seed ageing,the germination rate after ageing of Lot1 seeds with higher germination percentage changed slowly within ageing duration 84h,and that of Lot3 with lower germination percentage changed quickly beyond ageing 36h.The interaction between the ageing temperature and duration was significantly related(p0.01)with the germination rate after ageing of alfalfa seed,ageing temperature and duration were all the key factor for promoting the seed ageing.The result indicated that ageing temperature 45℃ and ageing duration 84h was suitable condition for accelerated ageing test of alfalfa seed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".