Effect of Ultra-dry Storage and Pre-Humidification Treament on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Pinus bungeana
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Different moisture content of Pinus bungeana seeds(7.27%、4.14%、3.19% and 2.18%) were desiccated by silica gel,and then storaged in ambient temperature for 3 months,and with the seeds storaged in refrigerator as the control.The ability of germination,the activity of enzymatic and the content of malonaldehyde were determined after pre-humidification treatment.The results indicated that:(1)The germination and physiological indexes of seeds which had been storaged all decreased to some extent,compared with not storaged seeds,but the moisture content of 3.19% seeds had the minimum decreasing,the germination only decreased 4.88%,come up to 52%.When compared with the control seeds,the germination and physiological indexes of the seeds with the MC of 3.19% had insignificant difference.(2)The germination and physiological indexes of the seeds which were pre-humidification treamented all increased to some extent,compared with un-humidification seeds,and the indexes of seeds with MC of 3.19% even overdue the initial seeds,achieve to the maximum,the germination reached to 68%,the activity of enzymatic were kept at the highest level,and the ability of resist lipid oxidation was also in the best status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it