Clinical research of needling Thirteen Ghost points on depression patients with cognitive dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: To reveal the effect of the Thirteen Ghost Points( Renzhong,Shaoshang,Yingbai,Daling,Shenmai,Fengfu,Jiache,Chengjiang,Laogong,Shangxing,Quchi) treating the cognitive dysfunction of patients with depression. Methods: Eighty patients are divided as figure randomly into routine treatment group and acupuncture Thirteen Ghost Points group. 4 weeks as a course. Given marks to each patient before and after treatment using Montreal cognitive assessment scale( MoCA,Chinese version),the mini mental state examination( MMSE) and activity of daily living scale( ADL) score. SPSS 19. 0was used on all data. Paired samples t test was used within groups,chi square test was used between groups. P 0. 05 was statistically significant. Results: All patients were gotten significant difference between before and after treat( P 0. 05). On the MoCA and ADL scores,Thirteen Ghost points group got a better achievement than routine drug group. Conclusion: Acupuncture Thirteen Ghost points is effectiveon cognitive dysfunction patients with depression. This treatment has seldom side effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".