MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383294977

Amino Acids in Surface Sediment of Chukchi Sea-Canada Basin

2008· article· en· W2383294977 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Haisheng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueChenji xuebao · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentOrganic matterTotal organic carbonOceanographyEnvironmental chemistryGeologyChemistryEnvironmental scienceGeomorphologyOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cruise of Chinese Second Arctic Science Expedition were conducted from July to September 2003, The concentrations of total hydrolyzable amino acids (THAA), hexosamines(HA) in the Chukchi Sea and Canada Basin surface sediment samples were measured. The major compositions were different between areas, in Chukchi Sea, Glutamic acid(Glu), Glycine (Gly) were the major forms of amino acid, while Serine(Ser) took the main part at the Stations B80, B11,P27 in Canada Basin, and features in sediments included total organic carbon(TOC),total nitrogen(TN),THAA,HA ,etc. varied greatly with different areas, TOC, HA were lowest at BS11 and that THAA,TN were lowest at B80; TOC, TN were highest at R03 while R11 had the highest THAA and P11 had the hightest HA. The spatial variation of amino acids in surface sediments of Chukchi Sea-Canada Basin was discussed, DI'' was introduced according to amino acid selective preservation and Principal Component Analysis to investigate the organic matter degradation of the seven stations sediments, by which we sort them as C15BS11R11S11P11R03B80, the sequence was related to sediment sources and hydrographic conditions. This indicated Bering Strait organic matter in sediments was fresher than Chukchi Cape and Canada Basin, between which was Chukchi shelf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChenji xuebaoSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207