Effect Of Ultra-dry Storage and Pre-Humidification Treatment On Four Kinds of Phenolic Acid Content of Pinus bungeana Zucc. Seeds.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Different moisture content of Pinus bungeana seeds(7.27%、4.14%、3.19% and 2.18%) were desiccated by silica gel,after the desiccation,the seeds were separately stored in ambient temperature for 3 months,and the seeds that were stored in refrigerator temperature were as controls.The ability of germination,the activity of enzymatic and the content of malonaldehyde were determined after pre-humidification treatment.The results indicated that:(1) After dewatering,the water content and seed phenolic inhibitory substances in the content of negative correlation;(2) compared with the seeds before storage,the moisture content of seed phenolic inhibitory substances contents were increased,and caffeic acid with the-p-coumaric acid content on seed germination of a high correlation after storage;(3) compared with the wet seed is not back,step by step back to the water content of seeds in the wet treatment phenolic acids inhibit substances has declined,and ferulic acid and salicylic acid on the germination rate has a higher correlation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".